<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Awesomeness.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness/comment-page-1#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/?p=856#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Great post Rich.  I too believe that &quot;awesomeness&quot; can be a brand differentiator but only when the &quot;fans&quot; deem the brand such.  A brand that claims that they are awesome is the same as one that claims to be the best.  Both are simply platitudes and ignored by consumers.  However, if a relevant brand sincerely portrays awesomeness in all that it does, it will easily convert consumers to fans who will evangelistically sing their praises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Rich.  I too believe that &#8220;awesomeness&#8221; can be a brand differentiator but only when the &#8220;fans&#8221; deem the brand such.  A brand that claims that they are awesome is the same as one that claims to be the best.  Both are simply platitudes and ignored by consumers.  However, if a relevant brand sincerely portrays awesomeness in all that it does, it will easily convert consumers to fans who will evangelistically sing their praises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness/comment-page-1#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/?p=856#comment-876</guid>
		<description>nice. I just might take the time to send in some thoughts, glad to see he&#039;s trying to make it more concrete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice. I just might take the time to send in some thoughts, glad to see he&#8217;s trying to make it more concrete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness/comment-page-1#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/?p=856#comment-862</guid>
		<description>No question. There&#039;s no hard and fast recipe. The manifesto itself is fluffy, but still super interesting to me. As a follow-up to the piece, Haque has issued a call to open-source the manifesto: http://bit.ly/ApICO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question. There&#8217;s no hard and fast recipe. The manifesto itself is fluffy, but still super interesting to me. As a follow-up to the piece, Haque has issued a call to open-source the manifesto: <a href="http://bit.ly/ApICO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ApICO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/on-awesomeness/comment-page-1#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redsquareagency.com/blog/?p=856#comment-860</guid>
		<description>In one sense I think he&#039;s definitely just jumbling around some conventional wisdom -- awesome is identifiable. On the other hand, just because we know it when we see it, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not intangible. There&#039;s no recipe for awesome. The procedure he outlines (people who love their work + great stuff + communities who authentically benefit) is full of big ideas that are hard to execute. Hiring people who love what they do. Making great stuff. Benefiting communities. Those are all difficult to do, and any company that finds itself blatantly unawesome will find little help in Umair&#039;s manifesto -- probably just a guilty feeling in the the pit of their stomach.

That being said, here&#039;s to awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one sense I think he&#8217;s definitely just jumbling around some conventional wisdom &#8212; awesome is identifiable. On the other hand, just because we know it when we see it, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not intangible. There&#8217;s no recipe for awesome. The procedure he outlines (people who love their work + great stuff + communities who authentically benefit) is full of big ideas that are hard to execute. Hiring people who love what they do. Making great stuff. Benefiting communities. Those are all difficult to do, and any company that finds itself blatantly unawesome will find little help in Umair&#8217;s manifesto &#8212; probably just a guilty feeling in the the pit of their stomach.</p>
<p>That being said, here&#8217;s to awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

